hessen.social ist einer von vielen unabhängigen Mastodon-Servern, mit dem du dich im Fediverse beteiligen kannst.
hessen.social ist die Mastodongemeinschaft für alle Hessen:innen und alle, die sich Hessen verbunden fühlen

Serverstatistik:

1,7 Tsd.
aktive Profile

#quantummechanics

2 Beiträge2 Beteiligte0 Beiträge heute

The United Nations has proclaimed 2025 the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology (IYQ).

At the @mpi_grav and the Institute for Gravitational Physics at @unihannover quantum mechanics has always played a major role in both experiment and theory.

We have put together a page for you that showcases our research related to quantum physics, associated press releases, relevant articles in yearbooks of the @maxplanckgesellschaft and, later during the year, current events.

Enjoy browsing 📖 aei.mpg.de/iyq2025

#IYQ#IYQ2025#QuantumYear

So uh I think I may have found a clue how to solve quantum gravity. Or at the very least explain what exactly causes gravity.

I need an expert on that because I sure as heck ain't one.

I coded a quick and dirty simulation of it and it actually did end up up producing the predicted result. If there's nothing that makes it inapplicable there should be some merit to it but I lack the formal education to be able to judge.

#Helgoland2025

Please share: If you are interested in the foundations of Quantum Mechanics, there are now again a few slots open in our upcoming conference on the island of Helgoland, in June 2025. Celebrating 100 years of Quantum Mechanics!

General information: helgoland2025.yalepages.org/
Direct to registration: indico.mpl.mpg.de/event/17/reg

This conference has an illustrious list of speakers and panelists, including people like Alain Aspect, Anton Zeilinger, John Clauser, Serge Haroche, David Wineland, Michelle Simmons, and many many others.

@MPI_ScienceOfLight
@maxplanckgesellschaft
#Yale

How Hans Bethe Stumbled Upon Perfect Quantum Theories

Quantum calculations amount to sophisticated estimates. But in 1931, Hans Bethe intuited precisely how a chain of particles would behave — an insight that had far-reaching consequences.

By Matt von Rippel

quantamagazine.org/how-hans-be

More information about Hans Bethe:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Bet

The United Nations has proclaimed 2025 the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology (IYQ).

At the @mpi_grav and the Institute for Gravitational Physics at @unihannover quantum mechanics has always played a major role in both experiment and theory.

We have put together a page for you that showcases our research related to quantum physics, associated press releases, relevant articles in yearbooks of the @maxplanckgesellschaft and, later during the year, current events.

Enjoy browsing: aei.mpg.de/iyq2025

#IYQ#IYQ2025#QuantumYear

#PhysicsJournalClub
"The Tumultuous Birth of Quantum Mechanics"
by Philip Ball

physics.aps.org/articles/v18/2

"quantum mechanics wasn’t created all at once. It took several decades and was a messy, confused process, during most of which the true nature of this revolution was obscure. In some ways it still is."

Physics · The Tumultuous Birth of Quantum MechanicsThe creation of modern quantum mechanics was a messy business in which many of the participants did not grasp the significance of their own discoveries.

The efficient conversion of #solar #energy into storable forms of #chemical energy is the dream of many engineers. Nature found a perfect solution to this problem billions of years ago. A new study shows that #quantum mechanics is not just for #physicists but also plays a key role in biology.
#QuantumScience #QuantumMechanics #Chemistry #Biology #sflorg
sflorg.com/2025/02/qs02042501.

www.sflorg.comQuantum mechanics helps with photosynthesisWhy do plants transport energy so efficiently and quickly?

#PhysicsFactlet
Do you want an interpretation of quantum mechanics that doesn't really work that well in practice, but that would look fantastic for your Sci-Fi novel? I have for you "Many interacting words" (not to be confused with the similarly named "Many worlds interpretation").
In this interpretation the universe is 100% classical, but instead of being one universe there is a VERY large number of them, all classical and weakly interacting with each other. In particular each particle is classical, but is repelled by its "copies" in the other universes. This is able to replicate a lot of the most weird effects of quantum mechanics. For instance, classically a particle is not able to overcome a potential barrier if it doesn't have enough energy to do so, but in this interpretation the particle would be repelled by its copies, so it has a non-zero chance of getting enough of a kick to jump on the other side of the barrier, producing the phenomenon we usually call "quantum tunnelling".
Another effect replicated by this model is the "zero point energy" i.e. the fact that the lowest energy a particle can have is not zero, but a bit higher than that. In this interpretation this comes to be because the particle (which is classic) would like to sit at zero energy, but so do all of its "copies", and they repel, so none of them can really sit at zero energy.
If you want, in this interpretation the very fact we see quantum effects is evidence of parallel universes!
journals.aps.org/prx/abstract/

#PhysicsJournalClub
"Testing the necessity of complex numbers in traditional quantum theory with quantum computers"
by Jarrett L. Lancaster and Nicholas M. Palladino
Am. J. Phys. 93, 110 (2025)

In classical electrodynamics the use of complex numbers is only due to to its convenience for calculations. Nobody wants to remember all those pesky trigonometric identities, so we use complex numbers to simplify calculations and take the real part at the end. You need to be a bit careful when calculating stuff like the Poynting vector, but this is well addressed ion any half-decent undergrad-level textbook.
But for quantum mechanics the problem is less obvious. On one hand we only ever measure real quantities, but on the other hand the imaginary unit appears explicitly in the Schrödinger equation, and no textbook I am aware of ever even mention the possibility that quantum numbers might be just a calculation convenience like it is in classical electrodynamics.
The question is subtle enough that you are going to find no shortage of well-read Physicists claiming that it is "obvious" that complex numbers are necessary for quantum mechanics, or that it is "obvious" that you could just use real numbers if you wanted.
This paper makes a pretty good job at explaining the problem, going through some of the history and explicit calculations, up to constructing explicitly a real-valued version of QM.
The second part, where they make an "experiment" on a IBM cloud quantum computer is (imho) less interesting, and their conclusion that you need indeed complex numbers not really supported by the evidence, but your mileage might vary 🙂
pubs.aip.org/aapt/ajp/article/